[pacman-dev] bug during package upgrade?
Dan McGee
dpmcgee at gmail.com
Sat Mar 22 16:20:06 EDT 2008
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Roman Kyrylych
<roman.kyrylych at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2008/3/22, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com>:
> > On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Roman Kyrylych
> >
> > <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 2008/3/22, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com>:
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Roman Kyrylych
> > > > <roman.kyrylych at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > >
> > > > > Here's Tobias' pacman.log.
> > > > > Notice that klibc-kbd is not installed at all, though the newest
> > > > > mkinitcpio depends on it.
> > > > >
> > > > > The line
> > > > > [2008-03-21 19:57] installed klibc-kbd (1.15.20080312-4)
> > > > > at the bottom is from manual installation.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Needed:
> > > > * pacman version (I'm guessing pre-3.1? Or am I way off)
> > > > * pacman -Qip mkinitcpio-0.5.18pre2-1 output (I wonder if the deps
> > > > were wrong here)
> > >
> > > pacman 3.1.3
> > > mkinitcpio-0.5.18pre2-1 had klibc-kbd as a dependency
> >
> >
> > The output of pacman -Qip would have been great then...
> >
> > $ pacman -Qip /var/cache/pacman/pkg/mkinitcpio-0.5.18pre2-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
> > Filename : mkinitcpio-0.5.18pre2-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
> > Name : mkinitcpio
> > Version : 0.5.18pre2-1
> > URL : http://www.archlinux.org/
> > Licenses : GPL
> > Groups : base
> > Provides : None
> > Depends On : klibc>=1.5-5 klibc-extras>=2.4 klibc-udev>=116-3
> > gen-init-cpio klibc-module-init-tools coreutils bash
> > klibc-kbd
> > Optional Deps : None
> > Conflicts With : None
> > Replaces : mkinitrd mkinitramfs
> > Compressed Size: 16.04 K
> > Installed Size : 88.11 K
> > Packager : Thomas Baechler <thomas at archlinux.org>
> > Architecture : i686
> > Build Date : Sun 16 Mar 2008 01:54:50 PM CDT
> > Install Script : No
> > Description : Advanced, modular initramfs image creation utility
> >
>
> Same on Tobias' machine.
> He's unable to reproduce it now after upgrade and is busy with ISO packaging,
> but I will try to reproduce the issue in virtualbox tomorrow.
Try to reproduce it with a pactest, perhaps- that way we will actually
be able to fix it if there is a problem.
-Dan
More information about the pacman-dev
mailing list