[pacman-dev] makepkg -b is wrong
Diogo Dutra
diogo.comp at gmail.com
Thu May 1 10:38:12 EDT 2008
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Allan McRae <mcrae_allan at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Xavier wrote:
> > > Diogo Dutra wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi guys, I have found a bug in makepkg, the makepkg -b dont install
> > >> builded packages as depencies, it install as explicited packages and
> > >> it is not good, I make a patch that revolve this problem.
> > >>
> > >> Im sorry for any mistakes of mine.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > This doesn't look bad but I am never very confident with makepkg :)
> > >
> > This patch looks good.
> >
> > <snip>
> > + echo "$(gettext " --asdeps Install package as
> > dependencies")"
> > <snip>
> >
> > The description of the --asdeps option should be "Install package as a
> > dependency"
Yes, the package is only one, not plural, it is more correct... and
this is my first patch submmited online, I dont have experiencies with
this.
>
> Haven't even looked at the patch yet, but should we really even be
> keeping this -b option around in makepkg? It seems like something
> another script (such as makeworld) should do. This isn't emerge here.
>
> -Dan
I agree with you, but I think the -b continue existing as -s, but -b
instead execute makepkg in recursive mode, my idea is implementing the
find deps $SCRROOT in another script (such as makeworld?) and -b call
this script as -s call pacman, because I think -b and -s have to
coexist.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pacman-dev mailing list
> pacman-dev at archlinux.org
> http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
>
More information about the pacman-dev
mailing list