[pacman-dev] [PATCH] Complete rework of package accessor logic

[Miklos Vajna]

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:09:00PM -0500, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, so you do still read the list? I was just checking. :)

heh, barely.

> But before you go howling at the copyright police (which is completely
> different than a GPL violation, so I apologize for that mixup in the
> past), it sure would be nice if you gave us some credit too when you
> do port over our commits and work. And our project name is not
> pacman-g1.

ok, i'll try to stop using it, just mplayer was always called as
mplayer-g1 on the mplayer-g2 mailing list and i got that bad habit, my
bad. (probably "old pacman" is even more arrogant :P)

> http://git.frugalware.org/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?p=pacman-g2.git;a=commitdiff;h=f87038121e5b5973e617fd05c96c3edf763b4e2c
> http://git.frugalware.org/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?p=pacman-g2.git;a=commitdiff;h=4bb7ba1ceaf0e7eb0805938eceb5c596b409ddb6
> (ok, this one is a joke)
> http://git.frugalware.org/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?p=pacman-g2.git;a=commitdiff;h=0700a6a31bfb119778cc71ffad5d123b1f37be95
> (you did give credit here, thanks, but still couldn't set the author
> right?)

yup, i think you discovered the --author switch of git-commit way before
me! (nowadays i usually use it where appreciate)

> http://git.frugalware.org/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?p=pacman-g2.git;a=commitdiff;h=9bde1c36eb10ff121f7de5bb34ade2a704f49c82
> (nice jab there, pretty mature)

oh well, different targets. this is just a decision. we try to keep a
stable api, you don't. both has benefits. and at the end users can
choose. that's the best :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/attachments/20080513/a99bd784/attachment.pgp>