[pacman-dev] yesno -> noyes for PM_TRANS_CONV_REMOVE_PKGS?

Nagy Gabor ngaba at bibl.u-szeged.hu
Tue Jun 9 10:59:37 EDT 2009


Hi!

IMHO the default no answer is better. If pacman is invoked with
--noconfirm (see scripts), it is unpredictable what will happen. By the
way, I _want_ to install the specified packages, so by default, I would
say no.

However, then it is not possible to test the remove_unresolvable feature
with pactest :-(.
[In fact, this problem appeared when I tested "-S and -U merge" with our
testsuite (I proudly announce, that it seems to work and the patch sum
is -100 lines), and the unresolvable targets were removed with -U as
well.]

Opinions?




More information about the pacman-dev mailing list