[pacman-dev] [PATCH] Fix compile error with clang-2.8

Dan McGee dpmcgee at gmail.com
Thu Oct 7 08:51:45 EDT 2010


On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Allan McRae <allan at archlinux.org> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan at archlinux.org>
>> ---
>>
>> wint_t appears to be the same as size_t or unsigned long. It probably best if
>> someone checks that is the right format specifier on x86_64 too...
>
> man wchar.h:
>       The implementation shall support one or more  programming  environments
>       in which the width of wint_t is no greater than the width of type long.
>
> man printf(3):
>       l      (ell) A following integer conversion corresponds to a
> long int or unsigned long int argument, or a following n conversion
> corre‐
>              sponds to a pointer to a long int argument, or a
> following c conversion corresponds to a wint_t argument, or a
> following s  con‐
>              version corresponds to a pointer to wchar_t argument.
>
> So we should really be using '%lc', it sounds like clang is busted...
>
> What does printf("%ls", p) give you? This isn't actually right because
> we don't want to print the full string, just one character, but it
> would be interesting to see if they implemented half of the spec.

And it may have been solved already...
http://www.mail-archive.com/cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu/msg26807.html

-Dan


More information about the pacman-dev mailing list