[pacman-dev] [PATCH] Fix compile error with clang-2.8

[Allan McRae]

On 07/10/10 22:51, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Dan McGee<dpmcgee at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Allan McRae<allan at archlinux.org>  wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Allan McRae<allan at archlinux.org>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> wint_t appears to be the same as size_t or unsigned long. It probably best if
>>> someone checks that is the right format specifier on x86_64 too...
>>
>> man wchar.h:
>>        The implementation shall support one or more  programming  environments
>>        in which the width of wint_t is no greater than the width of type long.
>>
>> man printf(3):
>>        l      (ell) A following integer conversion corresponds to a
>> long int or unsigned long int argument, or a following n conversion
>> corre‐
>>               sponds to a pointer to a long int argument, or a
>> following c conversion corresponds to a wint_t argument, or a
>> following s  con‐
>>               version corresponds to a pointer to wchar_t argument.
>>
>> So we should really be using '%lc', it sounds like clang is busted...
>>
>> What does printf("%ls", p) give you? This isn't actually right because
>> we don't want to print the full string, just one character, but it
>> would be interesting to see if they implemented half of the spec.
>
> And it may have been solved already...
> http://www.mail-archive.com/cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu/msg26807.html

Well, that was fast!  I had not even reported a bug yet...