[pacman-dev] [PATCH 1/4] pacman-key.sh.in: applied patch by Denis A. Altoé Falqueto
Ivan Kanak
ivan.kanak at gmail.com
Wed Apr 20 15:55:11 EDT 2011
On 20 April 2011 16:01, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Rémy Oudompheng
> <remyoudompheng at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue 19 April 2011 at 23:19 +0300, ivan.kanak at gmail.com wrote:
> >> From: Ivan Kanakarakis <ivan.kanak at gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Denis' patch applied to master
> >>
> >> ---
> >> scripts/pacman-key.sh.in | 520
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> >> 1 files changed, 277 insertions(+), 243 deletions(-)
> >>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > This patch seems to apply random whitespace changes over all the file.
> > Could you resend it without the whitespace changes so that it is easier
> > to see what has changed?
>
> More to the point- this patch has an awful commit message, as do the
> others in the series, so I won't look at them until that is fixed.
>
> 1. I don't know what is even being done by this (see the subject), and
> the commit message helps less- it needs to be a paragraph summary of
> what you are trying to accomplish.
> 2. Please use sentences, paragraphs, capital letters, and punctuation
> around here.
>
> http://www.archlinux.org/pacman/submitting-patches.html
>
> -Dan
>
>
Alright, I'll try again then. Sorry for the fuss.
Just a question, commits like the 2nd one in this series, that change just a
line in a function but are not directly related to the problem one is trying
to solve, should they be separate or is it better to be rebased/merged with
some other bigger commit ?
--
Ivan c00kiemon5ter V Kanak
http://c00kiemon5ter.github.com
More information about the pacman-dev
mailing list