[pacman-dev] [PATCH v2 3/6] pacsearch: removed redundant sorting

Pierre Neidhardt ambrevar at gmail.com
Wed Feb 5 10:16:50 EST 2014

On 14-02-05 09:18:48, Andrew Gregory wrote:
> On 02/04/14 at 12:16am, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> > Package are processed in the same order as pacman output, so there is no real
> > need to sort, we can print directly. This makes the code simpler and faster.
> > 
> > The only difference is that local packages will always be printed at the
> > end. Previously, they were printed before multilib for instance.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pierre Neidhardt <ambrevar at gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  contrib/pacsearch.in | 46 ++++++++++++++++------------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> This adds an 8 second delay between sync and local results for me on
> a cold run.  It's not a deal-breaker for me, but I'd prefer to remove
> the sort by just storing the results in a list.

How is the overall runtime?

Your alternative sounds OK to me, but why is it so important to have everything
printed in one run?

Pierre Neidhardt

You're ugly and your mother dresses you funny.

More information about the pacman-dev mailing list