[pacman-dev] [PATCH] Added better colourisation support for the "-{Q, S}i" operation.
Xavion
xavion.0 at gmail.com
Sat Apr 23 05:39:18 UTC 2016
>
> I think there was a mix up there - those two patches have been pulled to
> my local git branch to be applied at some point.
>
Yes, I keep forgetting to think of 'pull' in Git terms. When someone talks
of pulling the changes to something, it makes me think they've decided to
discard them.
The -S/Qi patch is too intrusive for a feature that that I am not
> enthused about including (I believe Andrew has reservations about this
> patch too). It adds very little to the readability of the output.
>
I can't see how adding an extra parameter to a few functions is "too
intrusive". Similarly, I think four extra colourings (repository, name,
version, and groups) adds plenty to the readability of the output.
I am still questioning the advantage of colour the repo/version/groups
> in all the -s and -o outputs though. I see the advantage in
> highlighting the package name and the installed state. The rest I need
> to decide on.
>
Please don't remove any of the colourisation that's already present. If
there's one thing I hate in life, it's when people decide to devolve
something back to the dark ages (excuse the pun).
More information about the pacman-dev
mailing list