[pacman-dev] interest in using meson over autotools?
eschwartz at archlinux.org
Sun Jul 8 03:08:15 UTC 2018
On 07/07/2018 07:13 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> Would there be interest in accepting patches to make these changes? I
> propose we would carry both build systems in parallel for a major
> release before eventually dropping autotools.
I want this and have suggested it recently on IRC. I think Allan may
have suggested there were some gotchas for building statically?
That's something I'd like to keep, mainly so
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pacman-static continues to be a valid
recovery option for people with borked systems.
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the pacman-dev