[pacman-dev] interest in using meson over autotools?

[Eli Schwartz]

On 07/07/2018 07:13 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> Would there be interest in accepting patches to make these changes? I
> propose we would carry both build systems in parallel for a major
> release before eventually dropping autotools.

I want this and have suggested it recently on IRC. I think Allan may
have suggested there were some gotchas for building statically?

That's something I'd like to keep, mainly so
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pacman-static continues to be a valid
recovery option for people with borked systems.

-- 
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/attachments/20180707/f7b01752/attachment-0001.asc>