- Arch-multilib - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-multilib] Signoff report for [multilib-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Jul '14

22 Jul '14

=== Signoff report for [multilib-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [multilib] (2 total) == * gcc-multilib-4.9.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libtool-multilib-2.4.2-14 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 5 signoffs 2. lcarlier - 1 signoffs

1 0

[arch-multilib] Signoff report for [multilib-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Jul '14

21 Jul '14

=== Signoff report for [multilib-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [multilib] (2 total) == * gcc-multilib-4.9.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libtool-multilib-2.4.2-14 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[arch-multilib] Signoff report for [multilib-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Jul '14

20 Jul '14

=== Signoff report for [multilib-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [multilib] (2 total) == * gcc-multilib-4.9.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libtool-multilib-2.4.2-14 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 13 signoffs 2. anatolik - 1 signoffs

1 0

[arch-multilib] Signoff report for [multilib-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Jul '14

19 Jul '14

=== Signoff report for [multilib-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [multilib-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * gcc-multilib-4.9.1-1 (x86_64) * libtool-multilib-2.4.2-14 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [multilib] (2 total) == * gcc-multilib-4.9.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libtool-multilib-2.4.2-14 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 1 signoffs

1 0

[arch-multilib] access request
by keenerd 04 Jul '14

04 Jul '14

Hi, I'd like to maintain a package in multilib and could use the permissions to release packages. The package is lib32-simplescreenrecorder and my username is kkeen. -Kyle http://kmkeen.com

3 5

Re: [arch-multilib] Revoked keys
by danielwallace 23 Apr '14

23 Apr '14

Yeah, my key isn't revoked. There should be a ton of posts in the bbs about it. Somewhere it will tell you how to use pacman-key to remove it and the REadd it and it should work then Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Charles Bos <charlesbos1(a)gmail.com> Date:04/05/2014 3:53 PM (GMT-06:00) To: arch-multilib(a)archlinux.org Subject: Re: [arch-multilib] Revoked keys Apologies for asking in the wrong list. The issue is not resolved by updating archlinux-keyring. Trying to install those package still results in the same error. This is what I get even after deleting the package and updating the keyring: error: lib32-nss: key "Daniel Wallace <danielwallace(a)gtmanfred.com>" is disabled :: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/lib32-nss-3.15.5-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)). On 04/04/14 22:39, danielwallace wrote: > No it isn't, Pacman-key used to be broken and now isn't. You will > need to update archlinux-keyring. > > > Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Charles Bos > Date:04/04/2014 4:24 PM (GMT-06:00) > To: arch-multilib(a)archlinux.org > Subject: [arch-multilib] Revoked keys > > Hi, > > I hope this is the right list to be posting this in. I was installing > the lib32 version of flash and happened to notice that the following > multilib packages are signed with a revoked key: lib32-nspr, lib32-nss, > lib32-curl. > > Regards > _______________________________________________ > arch-multilib mailing list > arch-multilib(a)archlinux.org > https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-multilib > > > _______________________________________________ > arch-multilib mailing list > arch-multilib(a)archlinux.org > https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-multilib _______________________________________________ arch-multilib mailing list arch-multilib(a)archlinux.org https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-multilib

2 1

Re: [arch-multilib] Revoked keys
by danielwallace 05 Apr '14

05 Apr '14

No it isn't, Pacman-key used to be broken and now isn't. You will need to update archlinux-keyring. Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Charles Bos <charlesbos1(a)gmail.com> Date:04/04/2014 4:24 PM (GMT-06:00) To: arch-multilib(a)archlinux.org Subject: [arch-multilib] Revoked keys Hi, I hope this is the right list to be posting this in. I was installing the lib32 version of flash and happened to notice that the following multilib packages are signed with a revoked key: lib32-nspr, lib32-nss, lib32-curl. Regards _______________________________________________ arch-multilib mailing list arch-multilib(a)archlinux.org https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-multilib

2 1

[arch-multilib] Revoked keys
by Charles Bos 04 Apr '14

04 Apr '14

Hi, I hope this is the right list to be posting this in. I was installing the lib32 version of flash and happened to notice that the following multilib packages are signed with a revoked key: lib32-nspr, lib32-nss, lib32-curl. Regards

1 0

[arch-multilib] Questions for the multilib for 32 bit programs
by Cao, Renzhi (MU-Student) 12 Mar '14

12 Mar '14

Hi, all: I am trying to install the multilib for 32 bit program to running in my arch linux. I follow the wiki, and uncomment the multilib in the /etc/pacman.conf as follows: [multilib] Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist And then I run my 32 bit program, it shows: ./predict_seq_ss: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I try run: #pacman -S libstdc++5 #pacman -Ql libstdc++5 I get the libstdc++.so.5 in the folder /lib, however, I don't see any folder like /lib32, and also my program still get the same error, it seems my program still don't find the libstdc++.so.5 libraries. Is there any one can give me some suggestions about what I missed to do? Thank you very much! Renzhi Cao Email : rcrg4(a)mail.missouri.edu<https://bluprd0112.outlook.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=HgdIKZwfkkG-ZqHZQdR5l5Qjeol…> http://web.missouri.edu/~rcrg4/

2 2

[arch-multilib] Wayland support in lib32-sdl2, VDPAU support in lib32-mesa
by Maxime Gauduin 12 Mar '14

12 Mar '14

Hi guys, I'd like to add support for wayland in lib32-sdl2; for that I need to push lib32-wayland and build libwayland-egl.so in lib32-mesa. While modifying lib32-mesa, I noticed it now had VDPAU support enabled by default, and it needs to be explicitely disabled to successfully compile. Thought I might as well push lib32-libvdpau and build lib32-mesa against it since it can prove useful for lib32-flashplugin in steam for example. lib32-wayland and lib32-libvdpau PKGBUILDs and modifications to lib32-mesa are ready to go (merely ported what already existed in the regular PKGBUILDS). Is there any objection to those additions? Cheers, -- Maxime

2 2