On 25/05/2021 18:58, Antoine Viallon via aur-general wrote:
25 mai 2021 16:42 "Genes Lists via aur-general" <aur-general@lists.archlinux.org> a écrit:
As an outside observer of this thread, it seems like the time for discussion is over. This talk appears to center largely about opinions on civil litigation.
Actually, this discussion could be important if the responsability of Arch could potentially be involved. Nobody wants the Arch project to be sued or to be liable in some way or another.
...and, as I said already, it was long established that Arch is not liable or involved in any way. https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2021-May/036236.html But sure, let's keep talking about ways to obscure trivial patches to mitigate phantom copyright claims. I mean, really? Alad
aviallon