Re: [aur-general] Initial manual cleanup
Renaming packages is no longer necessary. In fact, the scripts require the
arch in the package now. You're using the same scripts which run the
official repos, so they should do things correctly.
Note that existing packages are fine, but all packages in the future MUST
have the arch in the package name
On Jul 17, 2009 6:25 PM, "Evangelos Foutras"
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Aaron Griffin
Renaming packages is no longer necessary. In fact, the scripts require the arch in the package now. You're using the same scripts which run the official repos, so they should do things correctly.
Note that existing packages are fine, but all packages in the future MUST have the arch in the package name
Sweet. Thanks for the quick reply.
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:32:12 -0700
Aaron Griffin
Renaming packages is no longer necessary. In fact, the scripts require the arch in the package now. You're using the same scripts which run the official repos, so they should do things correctly.
Note that existing packages are fine, but all packages in the future MUST have the arch in the package name
How are packages for "any" architecture currently handled? Are they duplicated for each architecture-specific repo?
participants (3)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Evangelos Foutras
-
Xyne