On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 5:44 AM, Andres P <stderr@mail.com> wrote:
http://www.mail-archive.com/pacman-dev@archlinux.org/msg04127.html
Maybe I was a little harsh?
Anyway, I don't care if you put a random bash script I wrote ages ago under GPL, Public Domain, BSD...
Nah, Dan was just looking for bad excuses why he didn't get this done earlier. ahah :) More likely, what happened is that he planned to work on this patch to review/improve it, and so he could have fixed the license change in the same time. But he didn't have the time to do it right away, and looking at it months later, he forgot you already gave your agreement to keep the license. Maybe just to be safe, it would have been better not to change the license from the start, even for a big rewrite. Btw the list of fixes and performance improvements does look nice, and the diff looks nice too. contrib/bash_completion | 535 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------------- 1 files changed, 202 insertions(+), 333 deletions(-) Now that I am back on bash, I suppose I could give that a try. Thanks for your work !