[arch-dev-public] The Arch-ization of packages

Simo Leone simo at archlinux.org
Sat Nov 3 15:54:54 EDT 2007

On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 06:08:53PM +0100, Andreas Radke wrote:
> Do we really need there rules? Can't we let the decision up to the
> maintainer?
> If we really need a rule I vote for providing packages pure upstream
> with a post.install message how to get it archiefied. Either with cp -f
> an included archiefied config/splash/theme over the default one or
> to show what additional package will provide the related Arch stuff.
I'm with Andy on this one. Leave it up to the maintainer. Yeah, it can
be a bit inconsistent, but I don't really mind a mix.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/attachments/20071103/439d1794/attachment.pgp>

More information about the arch-dev-public mailing list