[arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26-18.104.22.168-6
dpmcgee at gmail.com
Mon Mar 24 14:14:49 EDT 2008
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa at gmx.de> wrote:
> > Am Montag, 24. März 2008 schrieb Dan McGee:
> > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa at gmx.de> wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > > kernel bump release for both arches in
> > > > testing, please signoff
> > > > added atheros l2 network adapter support (used in eee pcs)
> > >
> > > What was wrong with AUR for this? Why on earth do we keep adding MORE
> > > PATCHES!?
> > more patches are so cool, you know ;)
> > i hope one day you get new hardware and you are not able to get your network
> > working, then i want to hear you scream.
> I have an Eee, I managed to pull off an FTP install just fine.
> I compiled the driver by hand, just as has always been the case for
> out-of-tree driver with Arch if there is not already a separate
> package for it.
> I did this 22 months ago for my zd1211 wireless stick before it was in
> the mainline kernel, and I had *0 days of desktop linux experience* at
> that time (on my own machine). 0 days. And now we bend over backwards
> for someone needing a driver? Ugh. I thought April fools and the
> rename to Newb Linux wasn't for another week.
I just want to say that I'm frustrated, so sorry for unleashing here-
I mean what I say, but am really not trying to start some back and
forth war that we aren't going to be able to make a decision on.
1) Did we even have a bug report for adding atl2? I saw a forum thread
that suggested building it from the AUR, which seemed like a valid
2) atl2 is never going to make it upstream- I thought this was the
criteria for adding a patch. Instead, an atlx driver is going to take
the place of atl1/atl2. When did we change our patch inclusion
3) You tell me in one thread that libarchive is too late, and two
minutes later I see there is a new kernel that was probably made for
the ISO. This confuses me.
The communication and transparency here has had a HUGE breakdown.
More information about the arch-dev-public