[arch-general] resurrecting srcpac

[Michael Klier]

Jason Chu wrote:
> I'm happy with these changes.  Now the only real question that needs
> to be answered should this be srcpac 0.6 or srcpac 1.0?

I'd vote for 0.6 (there might be still room for improvement: ie.
localization?).

Michael

-- 
Michael Klier
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20080605/ac8961d1/attachment.pgp>