[arch-general] [OT] What is wrong with DBus anyway?

[Arvid Picciani]

Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote:
> 2009/12/4 Arvid Picciani <aep at exys.org>:
>> http://blogs.igalia.com/itoral/2006/03/30/adding-dbus-support-to-gedit/
>>
>> priceless finding.
>>
>> let me sum up:
>> "
>> - There is feature X which works very well
>> - He discovered it doesn't use dbus.
>> - He starts work on a very complicated patch that makes it use dbus.
> 
> As I understand it, the complexity was related to the fact that GEdit
> didn't had DBus support. Of course the first patch will be "complex"
> and replace a "working functionality", but for now on, GEdit can
> expose events and functions to _any_ other application through DBus.
> Just because nobody is using right now, doesn't mean that it will
> never be useful.
> 

Correct me if i'm wrong, but i read that as:

"
- THe argument is valid
- but irrelevant because the positive side is some feature no one needs.
"

-- 
Arvid
Asgaard Technologies