[arch-general] archlinuxfr bad virtualbox_bin-3.0.10-1 package
catwell at archlinux.us
Wed Nov 18 04:12:39 EST 2009
Le Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:56:24 -0600,
"David C. Rankin" <drankinatty at suddenlinkmail.com> a écrit :
> On Tuesday 17 November 2009 05:50:02 and regarding:
> > Am Dienstag 17 November 2009 12:22:35 schrieb tuxce:
> > > I'm uploading it right now, thanks for the information.
> > You know that redistribution of the binary package is not legal? (except
> > you have got the permission from Sun of course)
> ... and the penalty? Answer: The profits made from the distribution in
> violation of the patent, trademark or copyright. The normal profits of 3rd
> partry repository maintainer for hosting any type of generally distributed
> quasi opensource package (usually $0, nada, gratto...) So in the case of
> damages=profits -- you can do the math.
Afaik the archlinux.fr mirror is in France, so the law is not the same.
I don't know exactly what they risk but they would at least have to pay
the lawyer fees in case of a trial. Sun probably wouldn't do that, but
Oracle I don't know.
> Of course all just assuming arguendo, because we know the archfr folks have
> the permissions they require :p
Why am I almost sure that they don't? ;)
More information about the arch-general