[arch-general] We need a maintained-by-TU chrome/chromium...
angvp at archlinux.com.ve
Wed Nov 18 09:10:36 EST 2009
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Juan Diego <juantascon at gmail.com> wrote:
> I would be happy to maintain that package, but unfortunately Im not a TU
> dont you think archlinux should have something similar to ppa from
> ubuntu so that it will be easier to maintain and promote personal
> repositories, aur is a good option but if I would have to choose
> between using a packages from aur or using a package from a personal
> repository from somebody I wouldnt think it twice, I would choose the
> personal repo one.
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Daenyth Blank <daenyth+arch at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 08:48, Hamo <hamo.by at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Dear Archlinux users,
>>> Chrome is likely to be a daily-use web browser and with the Chrome OS
>>> releasing,it will become more and more reliable.Archlinux is a
>>> rolling-release distribution and it aims at being bleeding edge.So we
>>> should have a maintained-by-TU chrome/chromium and it is really
>> If you're interested, I recommend finding a sponsor so that you can apply...
>> There are lots of software projects that would be good to have, but it
>> only makes sense to keep them in the repos if someone is interested in
>> maintaining them.
1) You will chose the personal repo, but is not trusted, is under your
risk, with AUR you have the option to see the source of the pkg!,
that's why AUR ;), in the past trusted users had their own repos, then
[community] was created. IMHO, there are repos with chromium packages,
if you want the binary version of them instead the AUR PKGBUILD, then
add those repos under your own risk ;).
2) No top-posting thanks.
angvp @ irc.freenode.net
Arch Linux Trusted User
Linux Counter: #359909
More information about the arch-general