[arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit - tone it down

Joerg Schilling Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de
Sat Jan 30 08:56:13 EST 2010


Heiko Baums <lists at baums-on-web.de> wrote:

> I mean I assume that you have a big technical knowledge. Otherwise you
> wouldn't be able to write such a program and build such an Open Solaris
> LiveCD. But I also can understand that some people feel being attacked
> by you. On the other hand I can understand that you like to see
> cdrtools in the repo instead of cdrkit since it is your and the
> original software. And I'd also vote for switching from cdrkit to
> cdrtools in the repos even if I generally don't mind with which program
> I burn my CDs as long as the CDs are burned correctly.

It seems that you also use this discussion to attack me.

It would help a lot of you first try to understand what happened. A person
did make a claim about an alleged problem without giving any proof for his 
claims. I asked him kindly to give enough information so in case there really 
was a problem, I am able to explain where it is located.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       js at cs.tu-berlin.de                (uni)  
       joerg.schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily


More information about the arch-general mailing list