[arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

[Kwang Moo Yi]

On 01/09/16 20:32, Chi Hsuan Yen via arch-general wrote:
> Yep that's my expectation. There were several times, that a new version
> with important fixes (fix for YouTube downloading, etc.) was released, and
> lots of people came to our issue tracker for "broken" YouTube downloading
> because the Arch version was not updated yet.

In this case, wouldn't it suite better to be in the AUR always? It would 
be practically impossible that a package to be reviewed and signed so 
often. Also, my personal expectation on the official packages is to be 
more stable than that.

Cheers,
Kwang