[aur-general] TU Application

Angel Velásquez angvp at archlinux.com.ve
Wed May 21 02:40:57 EDT 2008

Hi all.

Thank you for your support Allan :-), by the way don't worry about the test
the desmume packages, i test very close this package specially ;-) heh.

Not a big deal, but I prefer when there is a one to one relation
> between PKGBUILD and upstream sources, when possible.
> In the case of volleyball, it looks like we could have two perfectly
> standard PKGBUILD, volleyball and volleyball-data.
> By perfectly standard, I mean it is even possible to re-use the build
> function of the prototype /usr/share/pacman/PKGBUILD.proto without any
> modifications, which is pretty cool imo :
> build() {
>  cd "$srcdir/$pkgname-$pkgver"
>  ./configure --prefix=/usr
>  make || return 1
>  make DESTDIR="$pkgdir" install
> }

Hi Xavier, I thought the same when I adopt the package, in fact I have the
prototype of the split in two packages, but when I was submitting I stopped,
because i think in this possibility "who need volleyball-data alone?", so i
have been tempted in split this package in two, but I don't know, i'd like
to hear more opinions before create another package in aur who is just for
use with the package volleyball.

> But well I made the same suggestion for vegastrike(-svn) pkgbuilds,
> about not fusioning the game and the data, and I am not sure the idea
> was appreciated.
> So it is really just a suggestion, so take it or leave it :)

Thanks, and trust me that i am thinking in split this package, but i am not
pretty sure, yet, any opinion is good received :-).

Angel Velasquez
angvp @ irc.freenode.net
Linux Counter: #359909
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20080521/cdc36a80/attachment.htm>

More information about the aur-general mailing list