[aur-general] Voting for djszapi results

[Nathan Wayde]

On 17/12/09 11:17, Xyne wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 01:44:39 +0300
> Sergej Pupykin<pupykin.s at gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> the voting period for djszapi has ended, and he did not get the majority
>> of votes. He got
>>
>> Yes: 4
>> No: 9
>> Abstain: 5
>>
>> It would be nice if there would be some discussion about the reasons for the failure.
>>
>>
>
> I understand the desire to discuss the rejection but this goes against
> the very idea of a secret ballot as each TU's reply will indicate how
> he or she voted. This may create tension on this list and elsewhere and
> I think it should be avoided. As bash has claimed, the answers can most
> likely be found in the previous discussion period.
>
> For the future perhaps you can request an additional submission field
> for the vote form which would allow voters to include a reason that
> could then be cited with the results.
>
> Regards,
> Xyne
>

nothing stops it being anonymous a second time: 
http://konnichi.com/anon-feedback