[aur-general] Voting for djszapi results
kumyco at konnichi.com
Thu Dec 17 07:01:59 EST 2009
On 17/12/09 11:17, Xyne wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 01:44:39 +0300
> Sergej Pupykin<pupykin.s at gmail.com> wrote:
>> the voting period for djszapi has ended, and he did not get the majority
>> of votes. He got
>> Yes: 4
>> No: 9
>> Abstain: 5
>> It would be nice if there would be some discussion about the reasons for the failure.
> I understand the desire to discuss the rejection but this goes against
> the very idea of a secret ballot as each TU's reply will indicate how
> he or she voted. This may create tension on this list and elsewhere and
> I think it should be avoided. As bash has claimed, the answers can most
> likely be found in the previous discussion period.
> For the future perhaps you can request an additional submission field
> for the vote form which would allow voters to include a reason that
> could then be cited with the results.
nothing stops it being anonymous a second time:
More information about the aur-general