[aur-general] Moving the AUR/community

[Allan McRae]

Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Allan McRae<allan at archlinux.org> wrote:
>   
>> Aaron Griffin wrote:
>>     
>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Pierre Schmitz<pierre at archlinux.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> On Wednesday 24 June 2009 21:18:25 Eric Bélanger wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> I propose keeping the readline rebuild in testing until the
>>>>> AUR/community move is done.
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> I would prefer a strategy which wont block "our" repos. For example I
>>>> have php
>>>> waiting in testing and Allan mentioned a libjpeg rebuild.
>>>>
>>>> There are only a few packages in community which need a readline rebuild.
>>>> So
>>>> what about moving the readline rebuild very soon (tomorrow), commit the
>>>> needed
>>>> rebuild for community and then freeze it.
>>>>
>>>> During the community transition we have an "empty" testing to play with
>>>> libjpeg and others.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Yeah. Considering that the libjpeg updates may be much larger, let's
>>> plan on having community-testing ready for that rebuild. How does that
>>> sound?
>>>
>>>       
>> Just noting that that libjpeg being large is wrong as far as community goes:
>> 84 rebuilds in community for readline
>> 31 rebuilds in community for libjpeg
>>
>>     
>
> Are you sure about that? From a quick glance at the bug reports, it
> seems to be the opposite:
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15165
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15222
>   

Haha, I suck!  Never deal with emails first thing in the morning...

Allan