[aur-general] Packaging LLVM

Ranguvar ranguvar at archlinux.us
Mon Oct 26 18:55:22 EDT 2009


Very well, I'll make a prototype PKGBUILD that has sections for each install
and then post it here, good luck :)

I do think it odd though that Clang would be larger than GCC, I guess we'll
have to see.

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Tobias Kieslich <tobias at justdreams.de>wrote:

> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Ranguvar wrote:
>
> > It appears that Clang is available as an actual release this time around,
> so
> > no need for SVN :)  See this: http://llvm.org/releases/download.html#2.6
> Oh huebsch! ... or sweet in English ...
> >
> > As for the splitting of the packages, it will be either difficult or
> > impossible to separate LLVM and Clang, is the problem.  Plus, I
> anticipate
> > Clang being _far_ smaller than the GCC frontend -- it shouldn't be much
> > trouble to include it in the LLVM package.
> I think you are wrong on both assumptions, just the clang_cc binary is
> 16 MB the combined libClang* come to 24MB so it is smaller than gcc I
> think but still significant. I do think, however, that there can be
> seperate packages, I have a pretty good idea which files are to put
> where.
>
> You are right that they will have to be build at the same time but we
> can split packages now from the same PKGBUILD file. Not that I would
> have done it yet but the pacman folks are working on it and AFAIK it's
> complete.
>
> The ugly part so far is, I haven't found a way to put clang_cc somewhere
> else than /usr/libexec which would be deprecated in Archlinux. If you
> move it around the static analyer barfs ...
>
> > The problem is that Clang must be built using the source from LLVM, and
> > seems to need to be compiled with LLVM.  That would suggest that to offer
> > Clang separately from LLVM, the two would have to be manually ripped
> apart
> > -- I can build LLVM, and I can build LLVM+Clang, but not just Clang.
> > That may be subject to change, of course, I may have missed something.
> >
> > So, the route I like would be to put LLVM+Clang in the llvm package, and
> > offer the GCC frontend as a separate optdep.
>
>    -T
>


More information about the aur-general mailing list