[aur-general] Drop LLVM from [community]

Imanol Celaya ornitorrincos at archlinux-es.org
Sat Oct 31 09:39:03 EDT 2009

On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Evangelos Foutras <foutrelis at gmail.com> wrote:
> Evangelos Foutras wrote:
>> Andrea Scarpino wrote:
>>> On 30/10/2009, Ranguvar <ranguvar at archlinux.us> wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> The package 'llvm' is an orphaned [communuity] package.  I'd like to
>>>> request
>>>> that it me moved to the AUR so I can maintain it (I have an update and
>>>> overhaul ready) and I can also create a 'clang' package for it. (split
>>>> package for llvm AND clang)  Then it can be adopted by a TU if they want
>>>> to
>>>> bring it back into [community].
>>> I vote for "move it on AUR"
>> I believe it should be kept in [community] as it takes a considerable
>> amount of time to compile (around 10 minutes on a C2D 2.66 GHz, using both
>> cores).
>> I must say I know close to nothing about LLVM, but I'm willing to maintain
>> it and learn along the way. So, unless a more knowledgeable TU shows
>> interest, I'll adopt it in [community] and upload a new package (based on
>> Ranguvar's PKGBUILD) in the following weeks.
> I've uploaded llvm 2.6-1 to [community-testing]. It doesn't include clang,
> as I believe it should be built as a separate package. I think it's possible
> to download both llvm and clang tarballs, place clang inside the tools
> subdirectory and run `make install' from there. We'll need to investigate
> this possibility.
> Testing of the uploaded packages would be appreciated. :)

I've found an error:

[ilcra1989 at acheron ~]$ llvmc test.c
llvmc: Can't find program 'llvm-gcc'

More information about the aur-general mailing list