[aur-general] Licenses, GPL3 only
Ronald van Haren
pressh at gmail.com
Thu Aug 26 07:29:09 EDT 2010
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Philipp Überbacher
<hollunder at lavabit.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Roberto Alsina's message of 2010-08-26 13:16:05 +0200:
>> On Thursday 26 August 2010 08:12:23 Ronald van Haren wrote:
>> > My second point was that we don't know what the future will bring.
>> > Will new applications being licensed under GPL2 or later, GPL3 or
>> > later, GPL4, GPL4 or later... there are lots of options. There are
>> > lots of possibilities and I'm wondering if it is at all feasible to
>> > create a naming scheme which will fit all.
> That's what I'd be in favor of. I'm not sure the '+' is the best way,
> because it has other meanings than 'any later' as well.
I missed the bloody obvious.... :lol:
>> For convenience, you may want to make GPL the equivalent of GPL2+
> I think that's not convenient but confusing.
Even with setting GPL to GPL2+, it is a lot of work. I don't even want
to think about the amount of work it creates not doing so...
Not sure if it is really worth the effort at this point.
More information about the aur-general