[aur-general] removal proposal for Ranguvar

[Lukas Fleischer]

On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 12:06:25AM +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> Ranguvar has been added in our team no more than last year.
> 
> Conform bylaws a motion should be sent and two active TUs and a
> voting procedure should follow after 7 days of discussion.
> 
> Here are my reasons:
> 
> 1) i noticed in January he doesn't have an account on our devel
> panel, i asked him to send all the infos to get one and he replied
> that he doesn't need one because none of his packages are suitable
> for community. Replying to his email i encourage to get one and
> adopt some packages from community. At that time we have ~700
> orphans and i haven't got any replies from him.
> 
> 2) no commits in community since the addition.
> 
> 3) he's not marked as inactive and conform bylaws this proposal
> doesn't have sense. Quoting:
> 
> "There is one special case for removal, removal due to unwarranted
> and undeclared inactivity, for which standard voting procedure
> deviates from the above."
> 
> I'm waiting to see your replies and then act based on them.

This is kinda sad to hear, but given the complete (and undeclared)
inactivity, I'd agree.