[aur-general] removal proposal for Ranguvar

Lukas Fleischer archlinux at cryptocrack.de
Thu Dec 2 23:47:37 CET 2010

On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 12:06:25AM +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> Ranguvar has been added in our team no more than last year.
> Conform bylaws a motion should be sent and two active TUs and a
> voting procedure should follow after 7 days of discussion.
> Here are my reasons:
> 1) i noticed in January he doesn't have an account on our devel
> panel, i asked him to send all the infos to get one and he replied
> that he doesn't need one because none of his packages are suitable
> for community. Replying to his email i encourage to get one and
> adopt some packages from community. At that time we have ~700
> orphans and i haven't got any replies from him.
> 2) no commits in community since the addition.
> 3) he's not marked as inactive and conform bylaws this proposal
> doesn't have sense. Quoting:
> "There is one special case for removal, removal due to unwarranted
> and undeclared inactivity, for which standard voting procedure
> deviates from the above."
> I'm waiting to see your replies and then act based on them.

This is kinda sad to hear, but given the complete (and undeclared)
inactivity, I'd agree.

More information about the aur-general mailing list