[aur-general] voting period for Dave Reisner
shacristo at gmail.com
Sun Dec 5 14:19:59 CET 2010
17/30 does not make a 66% quorum, so yes, the motion could still fail.
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Kaiting Chen <kaitocracy at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Dave Reisner <d at falconindy.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:39:13AM +0100, PyroPeter wrote:
>> > On 12/04/2010 07:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
>> > >Hi,
>> > >
>> > >the 5 days discussion period have ended.
>> > >
>> > >http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=42
>> > >
>> > 42!
>> Yup, that's right. 42. Vote wisely, gentlemen. We may very well unfold
>> the meaning of life here.
> This is sort of what I was talking about in my previous mail about the
> refinement of the bylaws. Thirteen hours have passed since the beginning of
> the voting period and at this point according to this page:
> There are thirty Trusted Users. Seventeen yay's have been cast and a simple
> majority has already been reached. We should amend the bylaws such that the
> voting period may end because no amount of nay's can change the outcome of
> the vote at this point. There is no reason for falconindy to wait another
> seven days to receive his Trusted User privileges. --Kaiting.
> Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
More information about the aur-general