[aur-general] Duplication: ocamlgraph

[Loui Chang]

On Mon 20 Sep 2010 11:16 +0200, Simon Legner wrote:
> do we really need three packages of the OCaml library ocamlgraph
> [1]? The packages are all up-to-date, but maintained by three
> different users. The correctest one according to the specified
> dependencies IMHO is ocamlgraph-withoutfindlib [2], which also has
> the minimal code for building the package.
> What do you think?

I would think the the most correct one should be renamed to
ocaml-ocamlgraph, and the rest deleted. You guys can sort that out and
report back. Cheers.