[aur-general] Duplication: ocamlgraph

[Magnus Therning]

On 26/09/10 01:53, Loui Chang wrote:
> On Mon 20 Sep 2010 11:16 +0200, Simon Legner wrote:
>> do we really need three packages of the OCaml library ocamlgraph
>> [1]? The packages are all up-to-date, but maintained by three
>> different users. The correctest one according to the specified
>> dependencies IMHO is ocamlgraph-withoutfindlib [2], which also has
>> the minimal code for building the package.
>> What do you think?
>
> I would think the the most correct one should be renamed to
> ocaml-ocamlgraph, and the rest deleted. You guys can sort that out and
> report back. Cheers.

ocamlgraph[1] has been orphaned, so I suggest first of all to remove it.
 Then
we'll work out which of the other two to keep.

/M

[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21687
-- 
Magnus Therning                        (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus＠therning．org           Jabber: magnus＠therning．org
http://therning.org/magnus         identi.ca|twitter: magthe

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20100926/5ccf56da/attachment.bin>