[aur-general] Duplication: ocamlgraph

Magnus Therning magnus at therning.org
Sun Sep 26 17:38:46 EDT 2010

On 20/09/10 10:16, Simon Legner wrote:
> Hi all,
> do we really need three packages of the OCaml library ocamlgraph [1]?
> The packages are all up-to-date, but maintained by three different
> users. The correctest one according to the specified dependencies IMHO
> is ocamlgraph-withoutfindlib [2], which also has the minimal code for
> building the package.
> What do you think?

I'm curious as to why the dependency on findlib is undesirable.

I've added a dependency on lablgtk2 to ocaml-ocamlgraph, so now they
match each other in dependencies.  Personally I think a dependency on
findlib is desirable so I think ocaml-ocamlgraph is the correctest one,
but I'm open to any counter arguments.


Magnus Therning                        (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus@therning.org           Jabber: magnus@therning.org
http://therning.org/magnus         identi.ca|twitter: magthe

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20100926/c4abec6a/attachment.bin>

More information about the aur-general mailing list