[aur-general] Duplication: ocamlgraph
magnus at therning.org
Sun Sep 26 17:38:46 EDT 2010
On 20/09/10 10:16, Simon Legner wrote:
> Hi all,
> do we really need three packages of the OCaml library ocamlgraph ?
> The packages are all up-to-date, but maintained by three different
> users. The correctest one according to the specified dependencies IMHO
> is ocamlgraph-withoutfindlib , which also has the minimal code for
> building the package.
> What do you think?
I'm curious as to why the dependency on findlib is undesirable.
I've added a dependency on lablgtk2 to ocaml-ocamlgraph, so now they
match each other in dependencies. Personally I think a dependency on
findlib is desirable so I think ocaml-ocamlgraph is the correctest one,
but I'm open to any counter arguments.
Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org
http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the aur-general