[aur-general] TU Application - Massimiliano Torromeo
sh at lutzhaase.com
Mon Oct 3 12:39:02 EDT 2011
On 03.10.2011 18:32, Massimiliano Torromeo wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Dave Reisner <d at falconindy.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 06:27:29PM +0200, Massimiliano Torromeo wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Thomas S Hatch <thatch45 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Are we getting rid of MySQL? Or just making Maria a "replaces" package?
>>> Getting rid of MySQL would be crazy!
>>> Of course, I'm going to use the replaces/provides flags, for both
>>> mariadb and percona.
>> Please don't do this. provides and conflicts, yes, but there's no
>> reason this should be forced as an upgrade path for mysql users. Using
>> replaces here is just as good as killing it off entirely. Users still
>> have a choice -- don't take it away from them.
> Sorry, I got confused, my mistake. Only provides, of course!
No, make it provides and conflicts. That is the way we handle
alternative but conflicting choices of packages.
More information about the aur-general