[aur-general] ibus orphans in [community]

[Yichao Yu]

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Yichao Yu <yyc1992 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Allen Li <cyberdupo56 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:45:51 +0200
>> Alexander Rødseth <rodseth at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If I understand it correctly, we _could_ drop ibus and just use fcitx
>>> instead, but supporting ibus as well is preferrable, since many people
>>> also use ibus.
>>
>> My gripe with fcitx is that it is poorly documented (in English at
>> least), and I wasn't able to get it to work.  I'm sure people are using
>> it fine, but I feel that the quality of software is limited by its
>> documentation.  No documentation = software sucks, end of story.  If we
>> move in this direction, I'd like to see someone familiar with fcitx
>> update the wiki accordingly =).
>
> We have just updated the English wiki of fcitx recently. It still lack
> some detail description of certain engines (e.g. pinyin) but simply
> install the packages and set environment variables according to the
> arch wiki should make it works just fine. Would you mind describing
> your problem (maybe on fcitx at googlegroups.com) so that we can help
> with it and probably add it to wiki?
>
> We are also aware of our poor documentation and is trying to improve
> that both on our own wiki[1] and on the user interface.

missing link

[1] fcitx-im.org/wiki/Fcitx


.... sorry


>
> THX for the suggestion.
>
>>
>> Allen Li