[aur-general] ibus orphans in [community]

[Yichao Yu]

For the gnome3.6 ibus-integration problem Felix Yan mentioned above,
the patch to split ibus into ibus and libibus is already tested and
can be found here[1].

[1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/32071

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Yichao Yu <yyc1992 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Yichao Yu <yyc1992 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Allen Li <cyberdupo56 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:45:51 +0200
>>> Alexander Rødseth <rodseth at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If I understand it correctly, we _could_ drop ibus and just use fcitx
>>>> instead, but supporting ibus as well is preferrable, since many people
>>>> also use ibus.
>>>
>>> My gripe with fcitx is that it is poorly documented (in English at
>>> least), and I wasn't able to get it to work.  I'm sure people are using
>>> it fine, but I feel that the quality of software is limited by its
>>> documentation.  No documentation = software sucks, end of story.  If we
>>> move in this direction, I'd like to see someone familiar with fcitx
>>> update the wiki accordingly =).
>>
>> We have just updated the English wiki of fcitx recently. It still lack
>> some detail description of certain engines (e.g. pinyin) but simply
>> install the packages and set environment variables according to the
>> arch wiki should make it works just fine. Would you mind describing
>> your problem (maybe on fcitx at googlegroups.com) so that we can help
>> with it and probably add it to wiki?
>>
>> We are also aware of our poor documentation and is trying to improve
>> that both on our own wiki[1] and on the user interface.
>
> missing link
>
> [1] fcitx-im.org/wiki/Fcitx
>
>
> .... sorry
>
>
>>
>> THX for the suggestion.
>>
>>>
>>> Allen Li