[aur-general] Copy.com dueling packages

[Jelle van der Waa]

On 02/04/13 17:59, Jonathan Arnold wrote:
> There are 2 packages for the Copy.com client software package:
> 
> copy - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy/
> copy-agent - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy-agent/
> 
> I think both have PKGBUILD problems, from dependencies (the Copy.com
> software uses Qt4, not Gtk, for instance) to poorly formed PKGBUILDs
> (one has just a package() method and one has just a build() method).
> I'm not really sure how this should be resolved, mostly because I 
> wouldn't pick one over the other right now.
> 
> Any one with more PKGBUILD confidence want to step in?
> 
> Also, if you're interested, sign up with this link and we both get an
> extra 5gb(!) of cloud storage on copy.com:
> 
> https://copy.com?r=NXWnIn
> 
Imo the 'copy' package is perfectly fine. The other package installs in
/opt which isn't needed.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 555 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20130402/be9a1a59/attachment.asc>