[aur-general] Delete/Merge Requests
stefan-husmann at t-online.de
Sun Feb 17 08:13:27 EST 2013
Am 17.02.2013 01:01, schrieb Doug Newgard:
>> From: alucryd at gmail.com
>> To: aur-general at archlinux.org
>> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 00:34:54 +0100
>> Subject: Re: [aur-general] Delete/Merge Requests
>> On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 22:25 +0100, Stefan Husmann wrote:
>>> * efl-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/efl-svn/ to be deleted
>>> * efl-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/efl-git/
>> All merged.
>> Doug: please send a delete request for efl-svn when you feel most users
>> have switched.
> I plan on it. I'll actually have 28 packages to merge once the switch is
> complete. I'm a bit OCD and wouldn't just leave them, I went through most
> of the Enlightenment packages in the AUR already and cleaned up a bunch
> of stuff.
>>> * geneet-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/geneet-svn/ enlightenment has moved to git, PKGBUILD hs no description
>>> * geneet-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/geneet-git/
>> svn still exists, git package does not point to the official
>> enlightenment git repos, is orphaned and has no description. I would
>> delete the git for now. What do others think?
> That git repo is Profusion's, who does a lot of work on Enlightenment.
>>From what I can tell, geneet was developed there, then moved into
> Enlightenment's official svn repo. I would say that geneet-svn is the current
> official version. You can delete geneet-git, but it'll end up being recreated
> when they switch that program to the new git repo, so it doesn't really matter.
sorry for not emailing you before emailing this list. I should have done so.
There are many many AUR maintainers who do not think about things like this, but obviously you know what you are doing. Sorry again.
More information about the aur-general