[aur-general] Delete/Merge Requests

[Maxime Gauduin]

On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 18:01 -0600, Doug Newgard wrote:
> ----------------------------------------
> > From: alucryd at gmail.com
> > To: aur-general at archlinux.org
> > Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 00:34:54 +0100
> > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Delete/Merge Requests
> >
> > On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 22:25 +0100, Stefan Husmann wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> ...
> > > * efl-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/efl-svn/ to be deleted
> > > * efl-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/efl-git/
> > >
> >
> > All merged.
> > Doug: please send a delete request for efl-svn when you feel most users
> > have switched.
> 
> I plan on it. I'll actually have 28 packages to merge once the switch is
> complete. I'm a bit OCD and wouldn't just leave them, I went through most
> of the Enlightenment packages in the AUR already and cleaned up a bunch
> of stuff.
> 
> > > * geneet-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/geneet-svn/ enlightenment has moved to git, PKGBUILD hs no description
> > > * geneet-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/geneet-git/
> > >
> >
> > svn still exists, git package does not point to the official
> > enlightenment git repos, is orphaned and has no description. I would
> > delete the git for now. What do others think?
> 
> That git repo is Profusion's, who does a lot of work on Enlightenment.
> From what I can tell, geneet was developed there, then moved into
> Enlightenment's official svn repo. I would say that geneet-svn is the current
> official version. You can delete geneet-git, but it'll end up being recreated
> when they switch that program to the new git repo, so it doesn't really matter. 		 	   		  

Thanks Doug, I'll delete geneet-git for now then.

--
Maxime

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20130218/68b7e1cd/attachment.asc>