[aur-general] [mcabber-hg] Disownment Request

Maxime Gauduin alucryd at gmail.com
Thu Feb 6 03:27:57 EST 2014

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:21 PM, <tuftedocelot at fastmail.fm> wrote:

> Actually, I do have another concern. The package mcabber-libotr4[1] is
> now superfluous. Under nixtrian, the mcabber-hg package did not enable
> libotr4 even though upstream has it in the code. My update to the
> PKGBUILD now adds libotr4 support by default (this follows the lead from
> mcabber in community). Should the mcabber-libotr4 package be removed? I
> hate to step on nkoehring's[2] toes, but it is the only package that
> user maintains[3].
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mcabber-libotr4/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/nkoehring
> [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?K=nkoehring&SeB=m
> Lucas
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014, at 09:06 AM, tuftedocelot at fastmail.fm wrote:
> > Thanks for orphaning all of the packages. I'll go through them and
> > figure out which ones are stale and can be deleted and which ones can be
> > kept. I'll submit changes necessary in a single request rather than
> > spamming the list with removal requests.
> >
> > Lucas

I'd leave mcabber-libotr4 for now as it is based on the stable release. It
will be removed when mcabber in [community] switches to libotr4 though.


More information about the aur-general mailing list