[aur-general] Unsupported architectures in the AUR

[Martti Kühne]

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:58 PM, LoneVVolf <lonewolf at xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
>
> Martti,
>
> the problem is not assembly in the source code, , but the fact that all
> compilers deliver machine-specific code .
> compile a C program on an arm processor, try to run the binary on a x86
> processor.
> It will fail always.
>


I am perfectly aware. I'm sure I was addressing the general case of
*using* architecture-specific code in the source state, which is where
a PKGBUILD would start off where that would be an issue. Thanks
however for clarifying this again.