[aur-general] Unsupported architectures in the AUR

Martti Kühne mysatyre at gmail.com
Fri Nov 21 12:03:36 UTC 2014

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:58 PM, LoneVVolf <lonewolf at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> Martti,
> the problem is not assembly in the source code, , but the fact that all
> compilers deliver machine-specific code .
> compile a C program on an arm processor, try to run the binary on a x86
> processor.
> It will fail always.

I am perfectly aware. I'm sure I was addressing the general case of
*using* architecture-specific code in the source state, which is where
a PKGBUILD would start off where that would be an issue. Thanks
however for clarifying this again.

More information about the aur-general mailing list