[aur-general] "pepper-flash" naming?

[DJ Lucas]

On 11/13/2016 02:33 AM, Det via aur-general wrote:
> I decided it would be good
> to ask the mailing list directly, should "pepper-flash" [1] be renamed
> to e.g. "flashplugin-ppapi"?

No. That has historically been the name. Anyone who is already familiar 
with flash on Liunx is likely to use "pepper" as a search term.

Coincidentally, searching for "chromium-pepper-flash" (provides) using a 
keyword search in AUR Web does not give any results. I would have 
suggested requesting another provides as a compromise, but it seems that 
doesn't work as expected. Should it?

--DJ