[aur-general] "pepper-flash" naming?
dj at linuxfromscratch.org
Sun Nov 13 09:42:44 UTC 2016
On 11/13/2016 02:33 AM, Det via aur-general wrote:
> I decided it would be good
> to ask the mailing list directly, should "pepper-flash"  be renamed
> to e.g. "flashplugin-ppapi"?
No. That has historically been the name. Anyone who is already familiar
with flash on Liunx is likely to use "pepper" as a search term.
Coincidentally, searching for "chromium-pepper-flash" (provides) using a
keyword search in AUR Web does not give any results. I would have
suggested requesting another provides as a compromise, but it seems that
doesn't work as expected. Should it?
More information about the aur-general