[aur-general] "pepper-flash" naming?
nimetonmaili at gmail.com
Sun Nov 13 10:08:34 UTC 2016
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 11:42 AM, DJ Lucas <dj at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
> No. That has historically been the name. Anyone who is already familiar
> with flash on Liunx is likely to use "pepper" as a search term.
Yes, but that's a non-issue because the default is to search by "Name,
Description". Same with (Oracle) JDK.
Coincidentally, searching for "chromium-pepper-flash" (provides) using a
> keyword search in AUR Web does not give any results. I would have suggested
> requesting another provides as a compromise, but it seems that doesn't work
> as expected. Should it?
I thought this was fixed way back in 4.1.0?:
More information about the aur-general