[aur-general] Special Removal of an Inactive TU: speps
lfleischer at archlinux.org
Thu Jan 18 21:54:42 UTC 2018
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 at 22:05:10, Thorsten Toepper wrote:
> Whether the votes happens in the AUR web interface or on a separate
> private mailing list is unimportant for the real process I agree, just
> at the moment it's the AUR webinterface and the second point is simply
> not too well formulated, in it's current form this also includes the
> votes and therefore in case someone participated in a vote both blocks
> are neglected. So the "either" "or" doesn't really work here.
> Rephrasing the bylaw to something like
> "performed any action that required TU privileges on the AUR
> (*excluding* participation in votes for there is below rule)"
Due to lack of time, I did not follow the whole discussion, so please
excuse me for potentially addressing things that are resolved already.
Using common sense, the bylaws are pretty clear. It makes no sense to
count TU voting as an "action that required TU privileges". Otherwise,
the statement after the "OR" would imply the statements before the "OR",
making the extra part "who has not voted in a consecutive series of
voting periods [...]" superfluous.
That said, I would appreciate any efforts to improve the wording, just
to avoid future confusion and discussion.
More information about the aur-general