[aur-general] Notification of GPL violation

[Justin Kromlinger]

On Mon, 17 May 2021 23:15:44 +0300
Bjoern Bidar via aur-general <aur-general at lists.archlinux.org> wrote:

> Does the license of the package still match? The statement 
> conflicts with the GPL (or any FOSS license for that matter).

IANAL but GPL generally seems to allow extension of the license (in reasonable matter). I would
say as long as we package the upstream LICENSE file (which we now do) we're in the green, valid GPL
or not.

-- 
hashworks

Web        https://hashworks.net
Public Key 0x4FE7F4FEAC8EBE67
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20210518/322a8947/attachment.sig>