[aur-general] ...

[alad]

On 24/05/2021 15:05, Manhong Dai wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-05-24 at 14:11 +0200, alad via aur-general wrote:
>> On 24/05/2021 13:43, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
>>> Who is this about? The noisetorch software, or the sge software?
>>> And
>>> what even is this???
>>>
>>> ...
>> The orginal discussion was already concluded with [1]. The ongoing
>> discussion of sge, initiated by Manhong, is completely unrelated and
>> nothing but spam.
>>
>> So indeed, everyone's time is wasted.
> If it is 'spam', why did quite some people reply? and why did a few
> even support my understanding about copyright? Do you think all of
> those replied are not able tell 'spam' from discussion?

This discussion was about noisetorch. You turned it into a discussion of 
copyright in general, based on your slights with the sge package. 
Replies or not, aur-general is *not* the place for that. There are 
plenty of mailing lists where legal topics can be discussed instead, 
such as license-discuss. [1]

So, please, take it to one of those.

Alad

[1] 
https://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org

>
>
>> Alad
>>
>> [1]
>> https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2021-May/036236.html
>