[aur-general] Notification of GPL violation

[alad]

On 25/05/2021 18:58, Antoine Viallon via aur-general wrote:
> 25 mai 2021 16:42 "Genes Lists via aur-general" <aur-general at lists.archlinux.org> a écrit:
>
>> As an outside observer of this thread, it seems like the time for discussion is over. This talk
>> appears to center largely about opinions on civil litigation.
>
> Actually, this discussion could be important if the responsability of Arch could potentially be involved.
> Nobody wants the Arch project to be sued or to be liable in some way or another.

...and, as I said already, it was long established that Arch is not 
liable or involved in any way.

https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2021-May/036236.html

But sure, let's keep talking about ways to obscure trivial patches to 
mitigate phantom copyright claims. I mean, really?

Alad

>
> aviallon