[aur-requests] [PRQ#12585] Merge Request for polysh
mr.felixoid at gmail.com
Mon Sep 3 07:25:08 UTC 2018
Good day's time Eli and Yen,
I hope you are well.
First of all, Eli, thank you for the answer. You are right, and it's
difficult for me to call my own "deprecation way" somehow but "stupid". I
wasn't happy, of course, about it but didn't mention the proper way like
"Merge request" one month ago. I'm sorry for it and for that fact that it
was in AUR for almost a month.
Because of it, I've fixed the package already.
Nevertheless, Yen, polysh package contains not an only script by itself but
modules in /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/, see . Regarding this, I
couldn't say, that polysh doesn't provide modules. Moreover, when two
months ago python was upgraded from 3.6 to 3.7, the package was broken
without any hints. That's why I've thought that it's a good idea to add the
prefix. IMHO, it doesn't contradict with .
I could only agree If you are 100% sure that the package must stay as is.
But as I see, it contains prerequisites to be named as 'python-polysh'.
вс, 2 сент. 2018 г. в 9:24, Eli Schwartz <eschwartz at archlinux.org>:
> On 9/1/18 11:53 AM, notify--- via aur-requests wrote:
> > Felixoid  filed a request to merge polysh  into python-polysh
> > :
> > Hi. I would like to "rename" this package into the proper convenient
> > python=project
> "proper". Yeah...
> Can you not do nonsense like:
> Leaving the package up for a month but making it only package a python
> script exiting after some silly message? is *not* how you "deprecate" a
> package, even if we assumed it was correct to deprecate it in the first
> Eli Schwartz
> Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the aur-requests