[pacman-dev] conflict and provision versions

Xavier shiningxc at gmail.com
Mon Nov 19 13:50:07 EST 2007

On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 07:28:01PM +0100, Nagy Gabor wrote:
> If a devel adds 'provision>=2.0-2' as depend, then this implicitly means that
> not "all" 'provision 2.0-x' version would satisfy this depend; and 'provision
> 2.0' says no info about -x...

Versioned dependencies with a release are a minority. So it's not a big deal.
If you still aren't satisfied, could we please talk about real cases where
this kind of dependency is used?

More information about the pacman-dev mailing list