[pacman-dev] Shaman dependent on KDELibs? (Was: Re: Little hello and pyalpmm announcement)

[Dario Freddi]

Hey guys,

after this neat announcement, since it looks like we're about to have a great 
GUI for alpm with GTK+, I think I could take the big step and make Shaman 
hard-depend on kdelibs for the next version (1.3). In fact many of the changes 
I'm making really require a lot of hassle to keep the Qt only and KDE version 
play together.

Please share your opinion (given that Shaman is inside community, too). Do you 
think it is worth it/can create problems to make Shaman hard depend on 
KDELibs?

In data martedì 08 settembre 2009 17:28:27, Xavier ha scritto:
: > On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Markus Meissner<markus at evigo.net> wrote:
> > Hello pacman-dev list members,
> >
> > I'm the developer (meissna) behind the python libalpm wrapper: pyalpmm
> > You can find more information in this thread (1st post):
> >  http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=60711&p=1
> >
> > As a very short abstract: pyalpmm implements a thin very high level
> > wrapper around the alpm library written in python.
> >
> > One of the main goals in the medium term are a transparent regular repos
> > and aur support ... (like mixing aur and repo packaged in -S)
> > Several steps are taken towards this goal, like building (mmacman -BI
> > some_repo_or_aur_pkg) supports both transparently,
> > searching ( mmacman -Ss query) also supports both: regular repos and aur.
> > The next step is already the "-S functionality" milestone,
> > which needs proper AUR pkg dependency resolution - this is in
> > construction, or maybe "conception" ;)
> >
> > And, dunno if this is usual, but one line about me personally:
> > My name is Markus Meissner, living and studying in Germany/Frankfurt -
> > right now I'm in Munich for my graduation and I'm 25years old...
> >
> > So, hi all!
> 
> And I just read the announcement of a graphical interface based on
> your project :
> http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=79764
> 
> I did not try pyalpmm myself, but it is a very good news that we
> finally seem to have working python bindings, that other people
> managed to use :)
> I know there were several attempts before, but it didn't look like
> they went that far.
> 

-- 
-------------------

Dario Freddi
KDE Developer
GPG Key Signature: 511A9A3B
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/attachments/20090908/46eea214/attachment.bin>